Reviews (122)

A bitterly disappointing finale to the story of Anne Shirley
Having listened to Kevin Sullivan's commentary on the DVD versions of the first two "Anne of Green Gables" series, I was forced to conclude that despite the excellence of those productions he really has a very poor conception of L. M. Montgomery's stories. That certainly helps to explain the travesty of "Anne of Green Gables: The Continuing Story." As co-writer, Sullivan totally abandons Montgomery's Anne books to spin his own overly melodramatic tale of World War I, even though the author's "Rilla of Ingleside" deals with that same time frame. Of course, Anne is almost fifty years old by the time of that novel and it is a pair of her sons who go off to fight in the Great War. Montgomery's novel was published right after the end of World War I, making it a uniquely contemporaneous work which richly deserves a film treatment. Maybe Sullivan objected to the novel's politics, in which the characters supported the war and the Empire, unlike Anne in this film, but who knows. Clearly they waited too long to get around to making this third part, since Anne and Gilbert should have been married long ago. Megan Follows and Jonathan Crombie are basically twice as old as the characters they first portrayed in the original "Anne." But while it is great to see these two playing Anne and Gilbert again and there is nothing to fault with either one of their performances, the story told here is just plain awful. There is no reason to tell the tale of a wife who goes looking for her husband in Europe using L. M. Montgomery's characters and if you want to do the struggling writer routine they could have turned to Montgomery's Emily books.

The first two "Anne" series were filled with warm and wonderful moments that you enjoy viewing again and again. The only moments that stand out in this sorry affair are when Anne finally finds Gilbert and when she goes back to the train station where Matthew first found Anne so many years ago to give us a sense of having come back to where we started. Of course, a lot of our disappointment comes from the heighten expectation of finally getting to see our beloved characters on screen again. I know I am not the only one who has read everything written by L. M. Montgomery after seeing the first "Anne of Green Gables" program, so I know I am not alone in being bitterly disappointed by this production. Even worse, the storyline here effectively kills ever returning to Montgomery's original stories, unless we are to suddenly believe Anne's kids end up being old enough to fight World War II. Watching this is just such a depressing experience that you have to go back and read again the best parts of Montgomery's novels or watch the first two series again. This is not something Anne's fans will ever treasure, even if they are compelled to check it out. When they see the ruined state of Green Gables, the aptness of the metaphor will be palatable.

worth missing
Unfortunately I saw this movie on the shelf and just grabbed it up, thinking it would be just as heartwarming as the other two. WRONG! The acting is terrible and the story is depressing. Not recomended at all!

awful...dreadful...disappointing...
...and I have never read the books - this mess is inexcusable and should never have been made. The 'plot' is incredibly unbelievable, the worst sort of cliche melodrama, and the virtues that were so evidenced and detailed in the earlier films are swamped under. This is one movie you can afford to miss - I can think of nothing good to say about it.

BIG Disappointment
"Anne of Green Gables: The Continuing Story" is a huge disappointment. This continuing story, sequel or whatever you want to call it should never have been made. Megan Follows' performance as Anne Shirley is horrible. This is not the Anne I remember from "Anne of the Green Gables" I am sorry to say. Her face and voice have changed radically. Megan Follows really did not age well. Her voice sounds like she's a "two-pack-a-day" smoker. It really is sad. As for the actual story I can only say that it borders on the ridiculous and ludicrous and reeks with mediocrity. The World War I sequences are foolish and laughable. The several coincidences that occur throughout this story are beyond all credibility. Sequels like this often destroy the original. I hope this does not affect "Anne of the Green Gables." "Anne of Green Gables: The Continuing Story" will be an eternal disappointment for many of us who loved Megan Follows in the original.

Worth having in your collection
If you love anne of green gables. I too was dissapointed at first. Mostly because i read the books and the differences in it were huge, also there is not much of the movie actually set in avonlea. But once you get over that it is still a great movie. I just felt that anne and gilbert after all the time they had to wait in the sequel to hook up would have married sooner (they did in the books) and the movie is so much later made than the first two, anne looks considerably older. making it seem as if they waited WAY too long to marry. but the story is a good one and full of emotion and adventure. In the books anne and gilbert marry and are happy and have loads of children. but as far as the movie goes i think it was still a great movie. ... Read more

Reviews (114)

I couldn't stop laughing
You don't have to be a Kiss fan to love this move (although it sure helps) But of all the comedies of the year, inlcuding Austin Powers 2, Big Daddy, and AMerican Pie, this is the funniest! Not for all tastes, but a must fro everyone with an open sense of humor!

The best 70's movie!
This was the best movie of the summer of 99. Everything about it was awesome. If you liked Dazed and confused, this movie has a great plot and is about four times better.

Detroit Rock City - movie review
Detroit Rock City is a classic teenage rebellion movie. It has a mixture of comedy, teenage pranks, sexual situations, drug use and just plain rock and roll. Even though I didn't grow up in the '70s, this movie will definintely take you back to that time period. Great acting by Edward Furlong and the supporting cast. This movie is a must for KISS fans. The story is of a group of friends, who are in a band and want to goto a KISS concert, but something terrible happens to their tickets, and after that the adventure begins. A very good movie. I am surprised it didn't do that well at the box office. I recommend it highly. If you like teenage rebellion movies or movies set in a different era you will love this film.

A GREAT MOVIE...
I was not expecting this movie to impress me at all and almost didn't go. Being a KISS fan though, I had to see it. 20 minutes into the movie, I knew I was buying it. Sure the acting wasn't the best, but the characters were endearing and the film itself and directing was great. You can see the thought and detail that went into this project and I think Adam Rifkin did a great job in capturing the mood of that era and age. His directing is definitely not "all over the place", but he draws you into the scene and then all of a sudden it changes and you are taken by surprise. The music selections which play through the movie also help in this effect. Let's face it - this is a movie about three guys going to a concert - let's appreciate it for what it is...an entertaining, nostalgic and funny film.

This movie Rocks...and Rolls!
This movie is reminiscent of the great teen films we all loved in the 70s and 80s. It is up there with Animal House, Meatballs, and all the other greats. I am not a huge KISS fan, but this movie was so much more! I recommend this film to anyone who wants to remember what fun, goofy, fantasy fulfillment films were like. ... Read more

Reviews (1)

One of the Best of the Harlequin Series
I really like this movie. It was obvious from the start that the worldly guy was going to fall in love with the small town girl. David Beecroft is dreamy and Cynthia Geary shines as the naive heroine. A must see for hopeless romantics! ... Read more

Amazon.com

Since many movie depictions of famous figures are cringe-worthy, it is pleasant to report that Two of Us creates a smart, informed, and intimate portrait of two music gods. This made-for-TV feature is a fictional speculation about a day in 1976 when Paul McCartney popped into John Lennon's New York apartment by surprise. With Yoko away on business, it's just the two giants spending a day together--bickering, goofing, toking, and eventually coming to a bittersweet reconciliation. There are awkward TV-movie moments, and some psychobabble, but the film respects its characters too much to round them off into simpletons. Director Michael Lindsay-Hogg made Let It Be, so he could draw on first-hand experience, and Jared Harris and Aidan Quinn are totally committed to their roles. For an even better speculative Beatles film, check out The Hours and Times, a superb study of Lennon and Beatles manager Brian Epstein. --Robert Horton ... Read more

Reviews (11)

A DAY IN THE LIFE ... A GREAT TRIP !
This movie will touch the hearts of any Beatles fan. The two actors who portray Lennon & McCartney really nailed down the personaltities, if not, on some occasions ... their appearance. Going back to '76 .. a time when there was still that possibility of the Beatles getting back together .. we still had John, we still had George. This infamous meeting has been mentioned in books .. All throughout the '70s .. we never even saw a picture of John & Paul together! This movie is a real treat .. it's like taking that trip back in time & never wanting it to end. You want to go back & spend another day with your heroes ... you want history to be changed .. you want to GET BACK to where you once belonged!!! HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! It really feels like you are witnessing John & Paul together again in a chance meeting in '76.

OUTSTANDING
This movie is exceptional in every way. The actors are completely committed, and I fully believed I was watching Lennon and McCartney interact. Furthermore--and something people have yet to mention--the screenplay is loaded with details of these two men from the period in which the movie takes place and written with a palpable warmth and love for John and Paul without being syrupry, cliched, or sentimental. As a die hard Beatles fan who has read more than 40 books on these two geniuses, this was the movie I had always wanted to see. The experience stayed with me for days. I waited for a long time to see the release of this film on DVD.

Inspired movie making
Michael Linsey-Hogg, the director of Let It Be, weaves fact and fiction into a compelling movie about two of the greatest personalities of our generation.

McCartney comes off a bit too warm in this but its hard to see that as a flaw. Reputed to be a 'cool' person at the best of times perhaps we see through to the real Paul. Lennon on the other hand is accurately portrayed from the clowning to the acid wit he was so well known for.

While the actors don't physically resemble John and Paul that well they certainly come across as them if you just squint your eyes and pretend a little.

Best moments in the movie:

McCartney in a heartfelt moment telling John how during the break up of the Beatles he felt as though he was losing his best friend. Lennons acid response. "We were never that close mate".

A scene in Central Park with the two of them in disguise. Reminiscent of A Hard Days Night is the exchange between them and two mounted police. We laughed out loud at this one and the scene just felt right.

A scene in a restaurant when an elderly couple finally get there nerve up to approach John. They make the gaffe of requesting that he sing a few bars of Yesterday (Pauls song). Lennons response again had us laughing out loud and again it felt as though it really was John saying it.

The best moment of all is one with John and Paul on the roof of the Dakota. I won't attempt to describe this one but it brought tears to my eyes and confirmed to me that the chemistry between John and Paul was truly magic.

This movie brings back a little of the joy the Beatles brought to the world way back when. A celebration of John and Paul and the real world magic of Beatle music.

Fooled me!
When I first heard about this film, I thought, "Harris and Quinn?" How will they pull it off? For one thing, there was the item of physical non-resemblance. But with the addition of a little nose putty, I was suprised to be able to see Lennon quite easily in Harris. Quinn's physical resemblance to McCartney is even more remote (you can add putty to a nose but you can't perform rhinoplastic reduction with makeup!), but factor in the clothes and hair and he comes closer. But it's the body language and speech which make him convincing. I didn't notice in the credits if there was a vocal coach, but if there was, he/she knows his/her stuff. If the actors developed their own accents and cadences, that's even more to their credit. They obviously studied these men assiduously. In some scenes I found myself feeling horribly sentimental, being of a "certain age." The picture is nicely staged, paced, and photographed. Entertaining start to finish.

JARED HARRIS IS FIRST-RATE AS JOHN LENNON!
A must-see for all Beatles fans. This film is worth seeing alone for Jared Harris' outstanding portrayal of John Lennon. It doesn't matter that Harris doesn't exactly resemble Lennon; his mannerisms, expressions, posture, accent and attitude are pure Lennon. Best scene: Lennon in a local cafe verbally sparring with a stuttering fan as to whether Paul McCartney & Wings' "Silly Love Songs" is worthy of #1 status in America. ... Read more

Reviews (21)

POWERFUL PSYCHOLOGICAL DRAMA....
Absolutely stunning film version of the Tony-winning play. Richard Burton is fine as psychiatrist Dr.Dysart who tackles a disturbing case involving a young stablehand, Alan(Peter Firth) who has inexplicably blinded six horses. Alan has become obsessed with the mythological horse god Equus and secretly worships horses in religious/sexual frenzy. Dysart (who has problems of his own) tries to uncover what led up to the mutilations and discovers the boy's parents were aware of some of his strange rituals but coldly did nothing. Joan Plowright is excellent as the mother who reveals too late her own shortcomings. Beautiful Jenny Agutter is also fine as the girl whose seduction of Alan in the stables leads to the tragic occurrance... but Peter Firth is simply fantastic as the mentally fragile Alan. His performance carries the film and his role requires him to be nude through much of it. But titillating this is not. It is a wrenching film and the blinding of the horses is almost unbearable to watch. This is the kind of film that challenges the viewer and leaves much open for discussion. On that level alone, it is recommended highly. Others beware that the bizarre subject matter may put some viewers off. Nonetheless, it's an excellent film and an unusual journey into the psyche of a most unusual (and sad) young man. Excellent direction by Sidney Lumet. Rather "bare bones" DVD but it looks and sounds great. A collector's item.

Something Went Horribly Wrong!
Directed by Sidney Lumet, creator of Network, Serpico, Dog Day Afternoon and The Pawnbroker; with the screenplay written by Peter Shaffer, the author of the original play, which is one of the great plays of the Twentieth Century; and starring Richard Burton, one of our finest dramatic actors; the movie version of EQUUS should have been both a thrilling visual and emotional experience. Something, however, went horribly wrong in translating the play to the screen. Nothing seems to work. For example, the blinding of the horses in the stage production is totally believable and so overpowering. Using men wearing metal horses' heads works completely. The similar scenes in the movie with actual horses are so brutal as to be almost unwatchable. The nudity is not at all gratuituous in the play but seems unnecessary in the movie adaptation. The spare set complements the acting in the play and is so effective. That is all of course lost in the movie version. Martin Dysart's talking to the audience is so moving in the play; in the movie it comes off simply as both artificial and boring. (It doesn't help matters that Burton has three volumnes: loud, much louder and too loud.) The psychiatrist's musings as to whether the young man should be "fixed" and brought into the mainstream but never be able to "run" free again are at the heart of the play; here they just appear trite.

Not every great work of art can be translated into another medium. I'm not sure this great play could ever be made into a good movie. Maybe a film should have been made of a good stage production in order that this truly great play could be seen by a larger audience.

Doctor must help a teenage boy with a horse and sex.
Richard Burton narrates to the audience and stars as a psychiatrist who is to help an english teenage boy, Alan (Peter Firth), who seems to be out of touch of reality. He loves horses and dreams of horses. Alan must see the psychiatrist every day and make progress or he will end up in a mental hospital. He is not allowed to watch television according to his parents, but remebers specific jingles and repeats them often. His behavior at times is erratic. Dr. Martin Dysart had odd dreams of his own and must get to the root of Alan's problem. Alan will relay to Dr. Dysart his own memories as a child and his obsession for a horse. ADULTS ONLY! Includes full frontal male and female nudity and sexual situations. Cast also includes Joan Plowright, Colin Blakly and Kate Reid. Richard Burton and Peter Firth were both nominated for an Academy Award.

Fantastic Dialogue and The Experience of Therapy
"Equus" restored my faith in Sidney Lumet after watching a few of his films that bombed. Lumet transfers the stage play beautifully to the screen, exploring an interesting case of a boy who has blinded six horses. Richard Burton is magnificent and one of the only actors that can carry on long-winded dialogues with conviction. Equally able is the deranged boy (played by Peter Firth) who cross-examines Burton, knocking him off his feet in a similar manner to Matt Damon in "Good Will Hunting."

"Equus" explores what it means to be normal. Burton's character realizes that being normal, to a certain degree, is having abnormalities. Peter Firth's character has a worship that is more passionate and alive than most human beings ever feel-certainly more than Burton's character. Burton longs to have the boy's passion and yet realizes that he is trying to free the boy from these feelings as he is doing so. He muses over the meaning of his life and the therapy he gives. If he can never understand "why" a child acts the way it does, is there any point to therapy?

While this movie starts out with a completely absurd and twisted plot, it eventually fades into a very believable plot line. As Burton pulls the information from Firth's head and we witness the boy's instable home life and threatening religious background, the plot becomes normal and we come to understand the boy's situation. The movie becomes clear as the boy's troubles become clear. The effect of this is that we experience the therapy along with Peter Firth. This is masterfully done and Lumet should be applauded.

My only complaint about the movie is that it is a little long-winded. However, the dialogue is top-notch and the acting is incredible. If you're a fan of Richard Burton and his monologue performances driven by a play-adaptation, get this film.

Equus = no good...
The stableboy is
a monster who should have been put to death for his acts. The film is a horrible waste of time, and yet another example of the worst of the '70s attempts to show how a film adaptation of a novel and stage play can be put to the screen and still manage to rope in suckers and even win some awards. These types of films generally suck plain and simple, but this is among the notoriously worst of its kind. Would you care about the boys psychological make-up and rehibilitation if he had done this cruel act to a group of children? I think not. Richard Burton is better served in films such as 'Candy' and 'Bluebeard' - Stick to comedies, horror films and period pieces and forget this bogged down, heavyweight crappola! Sentimental poop! God rest Richard Burton's soul for this one!! ... Read more

Reviews (58)

Prom Night not bad but not for everyone
The only reason i saw this movie in the first place is because i saw jamie lee curtis was in it so i thought it couldnt be that bad because i loved halloween and terror train. I also thought it was funny that leslie nielsen was in it. I saw wrongfully accused not long before that so i though it was funny seeing leslie try to do a serious role. The plot of this movie is about a group of kids who accidentally kill a fellow classmate while playing a game and then make a pact never to tell anyone about it. Years pass and then its time for the kids senior prom. Leslie Nielsen plays the schools principal he is also the murdered girls father. Jamie lee plays the girls sister and Leslie's daughter. While at the prom an on looker of the murder years back is there to seek revenge and one by one murders the victim's killers. Good who done it kind of movie. Mostly recommended just for fans of jamie lee or a good slasher flick.

I have to admit it...(* 1/2)
No matter how many times I try to like this movie, I always can't help but think it SUCKS. And the thing is, I SHOULD like it. It's from the early 80's, it's a slasher movie, AND it has disco in it! But I CAN'T! It's not scary at all, and the action doesn't start till 20 mintues 'till the end! The prom part is boring, but everything leading up to the prom is VERY boring. The only good thing about "Prom Night" are the clothes, hair, and music.

Prom Night
Prom Night is an 80's horror flick that is a great example of a guilty pleasure.This is probably one of my favorite eighty slashers.The acting is pretty bad, but I enjoyed the plot and thougt that it gave a great ending.The dialogue is cheesy which is acceptable since it's a horror movie.Jamie Lee Curtis does a good job as always with a not so well known cast.I also enjoy these movies were the killer is a red herring.Anyone who is in to the genre will definetly appreciate this film.If you not a fan of the genre though you may not enjoy it as much.I've been looking all over for this DVD and can't wait to get it!Make sure you check it out.A girl plummets to her death while fleeing from the taunts of four vicious classmates. Years pass: it is now prom night for the children who survived the incident, and someone -- or some thing -- is taking vengeance against them for their childhood sin. One by one, they drop.

Jamie Lee Curtis Is....... DA BOMB!!!!!!
Prom Night is a verrrryyyy great Horror Flick!!!
Jamie Lee Curtis isn't Afraid to Fight in this movie!!!!
I can't tell you who the Killer is, but.... Ahh just watch the Movie, you'll see....
a little hint: it has a sad ending...

Not The Worst Movie I've Ever Seen But Close To It!
After seeing the movie Halloween also starring Jamie Lee Curtis I naturally thought I would like Prom Night but I was really disappointed with this movie and think we wasted money going to see it and wonder why Jamie Lee Curtis and Leslie Nielsen even agreed to be in this movie. I will rate this 2 stars because I have seen worse movies but it's pretty bad. Just my opinion. ... Read more

Reviews (58)

Prom Night not bad but not for everyone
The only reason i saw this movie in the first place is because i saw jamie lee curtis was in it so i thought it couldnt be that bad because i loved halloween and terror train. I also thought it was funny that leslie nielsen was in it. I saw wrongfully accused not long before that so i though it was funny seeing leslie try to do a serious role. The plot of this movie is about a group of kids who accidentally kill a fellow classmate while playing a game and then make a pact never to tell anyone about it. Years pass and then its time for the kids senior prom. Leslie Nielsen plays the schools principal he is also the murdered girls father. Jamie lee plays the girls sister and Leslie's daughter. While at the prom an on looker of the murder years back is there to seek revenge and one by one murders the victim's killers. Good who done it kind of movie. Mostly recommended just for fans of jamie lee or a good slasher flick.

I have to admit it...(* 1/2)
No matter how many times I try to like this movie, I always can't help but think it SUCKS. And the thing is, I SHOULD like it. It's from the early 80's, it's a slasher movie, AND it has disco in it! But I CAN'T! It's not scary at all, and the action doesn't start till 20 mintues 'till the end! The prom part is boring, but everything leading up to the prom is VERY boring. The only good thing about "Prom Night" are the clothes, hair, and music.

Prom Night
Prom Night is an 80's horror flick that is a great example of a guilty pleasure.This is probably one of my favorite eighty slashers.The acting is pretty bad, but I enjoyed the plot and thougt that it gave a great ending.The dialogue is cheesy which is acceptable since it's a horror movie.Jamie Lee Curtis does a good job as always with a not so well known cast.I also enjoy these movies were the killer is a red herring.Anyone who is in to the genre will definetly appreciate this film.If you not a fan of the genre though you may not enjoy it as much.I've been looking all over for this DVD and can't wait to get it!Make sure you check it out.A girl plummets to her death while fleeing from the taunts of four vicious classmates. Years pass: it is now prom night for the children who survived the incident, and someone -- or some thing -- is taking vengeance against them for their childhood sin. One by one, they drop.

Jamie Lee Curtis Is....... DA BOMB!!!!!!
Prom Night is a verrrryyyy great Horror Flick!!!
Jamie Lee Curtis isn't Afraid to Fight in this movie!!!!
I can't tell you who the Killer is, but.... Ahh just watch the Movie, you'll see....
a little hint: it has a sad ending...

Not The Worst Movie I've Ever Seen But Close To It!
After seeing the movie Halloween also starring Jamie Lee Curtis I naturally thought I would like Prom Night but I was really disappointed with this movie and think we wasted money going to see it and wonder why Jamie Lee Curtis and Leslie Nielsen even agreed to be in this movie. I will rate this 2 stars because I have seen worse movies but it's pretty bad. Just my opinion. ... Read more

Reviews (21)

Clever story, good actors
I enjoyed this 4th installment of the Apocalypse series. It shows a little more character depth than in the previous movies. It also has a wonderful story that can show that God can truly change a man's heart.

In this movie, the Anti-Christ played by Nick Mancuso uses the law to sway more people to follow Satan. While the defense attorney play by Corbin Bernstein deals with his own conumdrum sitting on the fense between God and the Anti-Christ while defending a Christian in court for nothing more than being a Christian. It is a powerful interpretation of the possible events to come in the End of Days.

A scary look at the not too distant future.
Judgement, another film by Cloud Ten picture, continues the story of Helen Hannah and her band of freedom fighters and their battle against anti-christ. This one also stars Corbin Benson and Mr T!!

The christians, who are labelled as haters, are set-up by the ungodly government of the time as being terrorists and are tried in court for their hate-crimes. The trial soon takes a turn when the anti-christ decides to put God on trial! The film then becomes a court room drama and is very interesting to watch.

What really strikes me about this movie is the way the christians are labelled as "haters" and how this resembles the world we live in today. In my country there is currently a court case in progress where some ministers are being labelled as "haters" because they are preaching the gospel and managed to offend some people. This is only happening because of a "religious tolerance law" that has been passed here of recent times. It seems that tolerance only goes one way though, be tolerant of all religions except christianity is the order of the day. We don't have to wait for an anti-christ governmment, it's on our doorstep already.

Enjoy this movie and let it lead you to learn to think for yourself.

Thanks for reading.

I liked it!(Didn't expect to)
It's an end-times movie, at least, it qualifies as one. There's the antichrist(portrayed by Nick Mancuso on par with left behind's Gordon Curie), there's the Christian Minority,and then, there's the rest of the gullible world. Although, it doesn't exactly stick to the biblical endtimes, it projects the same message, the man of sin rules the world for a period, therefore this is an entirely feasible plotline. You also have the person who is on the fence and who witnesses the miracle of faith(Corbin Bensen).

It has a charm that's all its own, the trial is the highlight, watch it for that.

when 2 + 2 = 5
As we find ourselves tumbling into an upside-down world, where misinformation is "news" and truth is in scarce supply, this is a thought-provoking film, well acted and scripted, with a few action scenes thrown in for good measure.
It is a B movie with A+ entertainment value, and doesn't leave you with that "why did I waste my time on that dribble" feeling afterwards.

Some of the acting is exceptional; Leigh Lewis is excellent as Helen Hannah, who is jailed for "crimes" she did not commit, and Nick Mancuso is marvelous as the slithery and suave Anti-Christ, Franco Macalousso, ruler of the ultimate tyranny, a one-world government, who with his velvety-voiced delivery says the qualities he admires in a man are "self-centeredness, self-pity, pride and vengefulness".
Corbin Bernsen is convincing as the defense attorney, who has to decide which master he will serve, and get off the fence he has been sitting on all of his empty life, with a bottle for comfort.

Throroughly enjoyable is Mr. T, as a man who realizes that one has to confront the wicked, at whatever cost ("all is takes for evil to prosper is for good people to do nothin'"). Though not a "master actor", his charisma fills the screen when he's on camera.

With a fine score by Gary Koftinoff, and well-paced direction by Andre van Heerden, who also co-wrote the clever script with Peter and Paul Lalonde, this is a low-buget film that gives us viewing value, with something to think about while we watch. Total running time 1 hour and 40 minutes.

Best in the series!
"God vs. Man" is the basic premise of this story. Set in the near future, humanity has experienced a devestating incident--millions of people suddenly disappeared worldwide. The chaos that follows unites the nations under a global government led by Nick Mancouso.

The government line is that those who disappeared were reactionary religionists who served to retard humanity's evolution toward spiritual unity and enlightenment. Anti-government rebels claim that the global leader is the biblical anti-Christ of the New Testament book of Revelation, and that those who disappeared were Christians, whom God had taken up to heaven, just prior to a period of great judgment.

Accusations are tossed back and forth, and ultimately Helen Hannah, the leader of the rebels, is captured and put on trial for treason against humanity. However, her defense attorney says Hannah is not to blame--that she is a deluded follower of God--and that it is God who should be on trial.

The dialogue and plot are much crisper than previous ones in this series. The attorneys are passionate, yet cool and persuasive. The protaganist is both vulnerable and resolute--a powerfully nuanced combination that is most believable.

A subplot, in which those in the rebel camp argue over how much violence they can use for their cause, proved a messier storyline. It might have helped the overall product to drop this element, and enhance the main battle a bit more.

Overall, this was an excellent product--the most professional of the set. ... Read more

Description

RFK focuses on the final five years of Robert F. Kennedy's life beginning with President John F. Kennedy's untimely death in 1963 to his own tragic death in 1968.From the transformation of the younger Kennedy as he moved out of the shadows of JFK to establish and define his own political persona. Golden Globe nominee Linus Roache (The Gathering Storm, Wings of the Dove, Hart's War) is riveting in his portrayal of the young Kennedy. Also starring James Cromwell (L.A. Confidential, The Green Mile) as Lyndon Johnson, David Paymer (State and Main), Martin Donovan (Insomnia), Ving Rhames (Pulp Fiction, Mission Impossible). Written by Hank Steinberg (*61, Without A Trace) and Directed by Robert Dornhelm (Sins of the Father, Anne Frank). ... Read more

Reviews (2)

Haack's the man
I wasn't too familiar with Bruce Haack before I saw this movie. It caught my eye because I love music of all kinds, I grew up in the 70's and I was intrigued by the great cover art.
The film did not disappoint. It's colorful, playful and sometimes a little mysterious which is what Bruce Haack seemed to be all at one time. The film captured how innovative and subtle his music was and really seemed to get to the heart of what this strange person was really about.
Check out this film and check out his music. You're in for a good time.

Exellent introduction to an obscure but talented individual!
I had never heard of Bruce Haack before buying this DVD, and purchased it blindly based on the subject matter alone.As a home recording musician myself, I am always open to new and interesting kinds of music, and was completely astonished I had not heard of Bruce Haack before this DVD.

If you have heard of him, this DVD should be a no-brainer.Influential on modern music in so many ways, his contribution is nearly impossible to guage.He pioneered many of the sounds by crafting his intruments from scratch and came up with ideas back in the 50's and the 60's that are still ahead of their time.If you are familar with him, this DVD will let you see the man at work and get to hear from those he worked with.

If you have not heard of him, and even have the remotest interest in making experimental music, or just enjoy finding a lost treasure, you should pick this DVD up as well. At only 70 minutes, the DVD feels all too brief, but what you get from that 70 minutes is far more interesting and valuable than some longer documentaries I have seen recently.The director manages to put together the subject material in an interesting way and the movie never feels dull.

The special features are leaving some to be desired, but does contain a couple radio interviews that otherwise would have been lost.Upon seeing this movie, you want to hear more by this artist, and having a soundtrack included in the special features would have been wonderful, but even as it stands, it is a must own DVD.Even if you don't find experimental music too interesting and prefer top 40 music, see how some of those top 40 artists were influenced.Bruce Haack influenced many musicians while he was alive and has inspired this musician and hopefully will inspire more even after his death. ... Read more

Reviews (6)

The Christmas Wife
The Christmas Wife has been one of my all time favorite movies for over 10 years now and I never get tired of watching it.
As a matter of fact I watch it at least 3 times every Christmas season and I highly recommend it to anyone who likes good sentimental movies.

Understanding loss
This short drama was satisfying to watch even though there wasn't much action. It was almost like a two-person play. It tells how an apparently strong person copes with the dramatic change in his life caused by the death of his dear spouse. Christmas traditions are not the same, so the widower adapts by renting a companion. Jason Robards and Julie Harris are delightful to watch, so professional.

sweet
The acting is good, however it does leave one guessing.

The actors are a delight and they do maintain the viewers interest. HOWEVER; The ending of this picture leaves one suspended above the play.
To me, this film is a fill in the blanks movie that leaves the viewer wondering if this is all there is. Still I found it a delight to watch and a very wholesome picture.

Fix some hot chocolate and start a fire in the fireplace...
This is a surprisingly good drama for a lazy, frosty, Christmas-season evening. It's well-acted, well-written, and well-crafted -- definitely sentimental, but without being fluffy or soppy. The cast is led by veteran acting greats Jason Robards and Julie Harris, which in itself should make the movie worth a consideration.

Robards portrays John Tanner, a recent widower who doesn't quite know what to do with the changes imposed upon his life. When the annual family trip to the cabin for Christmas is jeopardized, he attempts to rescue his traditions in a radical way: he finds a dating service and "hires" a woman to be his family and spend the Christmas weekend with him. Julie Harris is the sad, perceptive, and mysterious woman, Iris, who agrees to be his "Christmas wife" - but only if he will ask her no questions about herself.

This is a quality "G" movie (at least, the version shown on television). At the risk of sounding sexist, I would say this is a woman's movie, but some men may find it not objectionable. Children may not be interested in a character (as opposed to action) movie about middle-aged people, but if they are, their parents won't have to worry about what they're watching. Adults who have some experience with age or loneliness may discover a tale striking quite a responsive chord.

"Over 50", Life 101
If you're over 50 this movie will be a great rainy afternoon delight. It is NOT a comedy! It is a hard look at life and what it brings. Jason Robards and Julie Harris are two of the classic actors of the last century. Just to see them act together is enough, but the sweet story of how life throws rocks in our path and the way we remove them is great! Treat yourself to perfection! ... Read more

Reviews (122)

Very Disappointing
If you love the first two movies, regardless of the books, you will be disappointed with this third movie. The problem lies not in the fact that the movie deviates from the book, but that the creators of this third film totally misunderstand why women love the film "Anne of Green Gables." The character of Anne in this third video is completely different from her character in the other two videos. Yes, Anne is one to find mischief and get herself into trouble, but I am not convinced that she would have acted in the way this third movie suggests. Also, her character lacked charm and the ability to find kindred spirits with everyone around her.

Another problem with this movie lies in the timing and flow of the movie. The creators of this third film tried to fit to much into too little time, thus creating large gaps and not enough substance in certain areas. Certain scenes are rushed through, and there is not enough character development.

I found the overall quality of the filming and the sets to be lacking. I must give the actors credit for their performance with such a limiting script, but this is not a movie I care to ever watch again.

Thank You for this Amazing Movie
My younger brother now understands WW1 better, I was left delightfully teary at the end, Dominic was adorable, Anne was brave, and there was, of course, the complete jerk who we all wanted to get rid of, and a fight over the baby, and who the heck CARES if none of this was written in the books, its amazing! Theres got to be more!

Different from the others but good!
I must say I was so excited when I found out that they were coming out with another Anne movie. I was five years old when I saw the first Anne of Green Gables, and it has stuck with me ever since. I have never read the books and I know I'm missing out, but the movies are so well done I just want to watch the character's act out their roles so beautifully. I wasn't really disappointed with this movie. I loved the fact that now I'm twenty years old and seeing the old character's again brought back so many wonderful memories. I thought it was good that Anne now went through more grown-up problems than before dealing with her love. The best part is seeing Gilbert Blythe again and the wonderful love that him and Anne shared. It will never live up to the originals, but I thought it was nice to see what happened 5-10 years later. It will always be in my movie library.

Okay, but doesn't equal the first 2 movies
Alrite, this movie was pretty good, and I liked it well enough because Megan Follows and Jonathan Crombie returned to portray the memorable Anne Shirley and Gilbert Blythe. Of course, as in most cases, this movie did not equal or surpass the first two movies. The ending seemed a little too disappointing and disheartening; furthermore, the movie itself did not carry the same magic that "Anne of Green Gables" and "Anne of Avonlea" had, mainly because this one was not shot in Avonlea. It's basically a film about WWI that just happens to have Anne and Gilbert as the stars. We remember the "Anne" movies as magical films with gorgeous scenery and the beautiful Avonlea; this is a war story and therefore does not have the same enchantment. Of course, if you are an avid "Anne" fan like me, by all means watch this edition and enjoy seeing your favorite characters for the third time.

Why did Anne go to Europe?
THE GOOD: It was fun to laugh at the story line and try to predict what preposterous event would come next :)

THE BAD: What possible good would come from a woman pursuing her husband onto the battlefield during a war? How many times did she interrupt legitimate work to ask where her husband was? Was he the only man in the war?

THE UGLY: This character (and the plot in general) proved to be too unbelievable for my liking - Anne would have more common sense than to endanger others lives and her own for a nonsensical rescue mission. ... Read more

Reviews (21)

Clever story, good actors
I enjoyed this 4th installment of the Apocalypse series. It shows a little more character depth than in the previous movies. It also has a wonderful story that can show that God can truly change a man's heart.

In this movie, the Anti-Christ played by Nick Mancuso uses the law to sway more people to follow Satan. While the defense attorney play by Corbin Bernstein deals with his own conumdrum sitting on the fense between God and the Anti-Christ while defending a Christian in court for nothing more than being a Christian. It is a powerful interpretation of the possible events to come in the End of Days.

A scary look at the not too distant future.
Judgement, another film by Cloud Ten picture, continues the story of Helen Hannah and her band of freedom fighters and their battle against anti-christ. This one also stars Corbin Benson and Mr T!!

The christians, who are labelled as haters, are set-up by the ungodly government of the time as being terrorists and are tried in court for their hate-crimes. The trial soon takes a turn when the anti-christ decides to put God on trial! The film then becomes a court room drama and is very interesting to watch.

What really strikes me about this movie is the way the christians are labelled as "haters" and how this resembles the world we live in today. In my country there is currently a court case in progress where some ministers are being labelled as "haters" because they are preaching the gospel and managed to offend some people. This is only happening because of a "religious tolerance law" that has been passed here of recent times. It seems that tolerance only goes one way though, be tolerant of all religions except christianity is the order of the day. We don't have to wait for an anti-christ governmment, it's on our doorstep already.

Enjoy this movie and let it lead you to learn to think for yourself.

Thanks for reading.

I liked it!(Didn't expect to)
It's an end-times movie, at least, it qualifies as one. There's the antichrist(portrayed by Nick Mancuso on par with left behind's Gordon Curie), there's the Christian Minority,and then, there's the rest of the gullible world. Although, it doesn't exactly stick to the biblical endtimes, it projects the same message, the man of sin rules the world for a period, therefore this is an entirely feasible plotline. You also have the person who is on the fence and who witnesses the miracle of faith(Corbin Bensen).

It has a charm that's all its own, the trial is the highlight, watch it for that.

when 2 + 2 = 5
As we find ourselves tumbling into an upside-down world, where misinformation is "news" and truth is in scarce supply, this is a thought-provoking film, well acted and scripted, with a few action scenes thrown in for good measure.
It is a B movie with A+ entertainment value, and doesn't leave you with that "why did I waste my time on that dribble" feeling afterwards.

Some of the acting is exceptional; Leigh Lewis is excellent as Helen Hannah, who is jailed for "crimes" she did not commit, and Nick Mancuso is marvelous as the slithery and suave Anti-Christ, Franco Macalousso, ruler of the ultimate tyranny, a one-world government, who with his velvety-voiced delivery says the qualities he admires in a man are "self-centeredness, self-pity, pride and vengefulness".
Corbin Bernsen is convincing as the defense attorney, who has to decide which master he will serve, and get off the fence he has been sitting on all of his empty life, with a bottle for comfort.

Throroughly enjoyable is Mr. T, as a man who realizes that one has to confront the wicked, at whatever cost ("all is takes for evil to prosper is for good people to do nothin'"). Though not a "master actor", his charisma fills the screen when he's on camera.

With a fine score by Gary Koftinoff, and well-paced direction by Andre van Heerden, who also co-wrote the clever script with Peter and Paul Lalonde, this is a low-buget film that gives us viewing value, with something to think about while we watch. Total running time 1 hour and 40 minutes.

Best in the series!
"God vs. Man" is the basic premise of this story. Set in the near future, humanity has experienced a devestating incident--millions of people suddenly disappeared worldwide. The chaos that follows unites the nations under a global government led by Nick Mancouso.

The government line is that those who disappeared were reactionary religionists who served to retard humanity's evolution toward spiritual unity and enlightenment. Anti-government rebels claim that the global leader is the biblical anti-Christ of the New Testament book of Revelation, and that those who disappeared were Christians, whom God had taken up to heaven, just prior to a period of great judgment.

Accusations are tossed back and forth, and ultimately Helen Hannah, the leader of the rebels, is captured and put on trial for treason against humanity. However, her defense attorney says Hannah is not to blame--that she is a deluded follower of God--and that it is God who should be on trial.

The dialogue and plot are much crisper than previous ones in this series. The attorneys are passionate, yet cool and persuasive. The protaganist is both vulnerable and resolute--a powerfully nuanced combination that is most believable.

A subplot, in which those in the rebel camp argue over how much violence they can use for their cause, proved a messier storyline. It might have helped the overall product to drop this element, and enhance the main battle a bit more.

Overall, this was an excellent product--the most professional of the set. ... Read more

Reviews (6)

The Christmas Wife
The Christmas Wife has been one of my all time favorite movies for over 10 years now and I never get tired of watching it.
As a matter of fact I watch it at least 3 times every Christmas season and I highly recommend it to anyone who likes good sentimental movies.

Understanding loss
This short drama was satisfying to watch even though there wasn't much action. It was almost like a two-person play. It tells how an apparently strong person copes with the dramatic change in his life caused by the death of his dear spouse. Christmas traditions are not the same, so the widower adapts by renting a companion. Jason Robards and Julie Harris are delightful to watch, so professional.

sweet
The acting is good, however it does leave one guessing.

The actors are a delight and they do maintain the viewers interest. HOWEVER; The ending of this picture leaves one suspended above the play.
To me, this film is a fill in the blanks movie that leaves the viewer wondering if this is all there is. Still I found it a delight to watch and a very wholesome picture.

Fix some hot chocolate and start a fire in the fireplace...
This is a surprisingly good drama for a lazy, frosty, Christmas-season evening. It's well-acted, well-written, and well-crafted -- definitely sentimental, but without being fluffy or soppy. The cast is led by veteran acting greats Jason Robards and Julie Harris, which in itself should make the movie worth a consideration.

Robards portrays John Tanner, a recent widower who doesn't quite know what to do with the changes imposed upon his life. When the annual family trip to the cabin for Christmas is jeopardized, he attempts to rescue his traditions in a radical way: he finds a dating service and "hires" a woman to be his family and spend the Christmas weekend with him. Julie Harris is the sad, perceptive, and mysterious woman, Iris, who agrees to be his "Christmas wife" - but only if he will ask her no questions about herself.

This is a quality "G" movie (at least, the version shown on television). At the risk of sounding sexist, I would say this is a woman's movie, but some men may find it not objectionable. Children may not be interested in a character (as opposed to action) movie about middle-aged people, but if they are, their parents won't have to worry about what they're watching. Adults who have some experience with age or loneliness may discover a tale striking quite a responsive chord.

"Over 50", Life 101
If you're over 50 this movie will be a great rainy afternoon delight. It is NOT a comedy! It is a hard look at life and what it brings. Jason Robards and Julie Harris are two of the classic actors of the last century. Just to see them act together is enough, but the sweet story of how life throws rocks in our path and the way we remove them is great! Treat yourself to perfection! ... Read more

Reviews (6)

The Christmas Wife
The Christmas Wife has been one of my all time favorite movies for over 10 years now and I never get tired of watching it.
As a matter of fact I watch it at least 3 times every Christmas season and I highly recommend it to anyone who likes good sentimental movies.

Understanding loss
This short drama was satisfying to watch even though there wasn't much action. It was almost like a two-person play. It tells how an apparently strong person copes with the dramatic change in his life caused by the death of his dear spouse. Christmas traditions are not the same, so the widower adapts by renting a companion. Jason Robards and Julie Harris are delightful to watch, so professional.

sweet
The acting is good, however it does leave one guessing.

The actors are a delight and they do maintain the viewers interest. HOWEVER; The ending of this picture leaves one suspended above the play.
To me, this film is a fill in the blanks movie that leaves the viewer wondering if this is all there is. Still I found it a delight to watch and a very wholesome picture.

Fix some hot chocolate and start a fire in the fireplace...
This is a surprisingly good drama for a lazy, frosty, Christmas-season evening. It's well-acted, well-written, and well-crafted -- definitely sentimental, but without being fluffy or soppy. The cast is led by veteran acting greats Jason Robards and Julie Harris, which in itself should make the movie worth a consideration.

Robards portrays John Tanner, a recent widower who doesn't quite know what to do with the changes imposed upon his life. When the annual family trip to the cabin for Christmas is jeopardized, he attempts to rescue his traditions in a radical way: he finds a dating service and "hires" a woman to be his family and spend the Christmas weekend with him. Julie Harris is the sad, perceptive, and mysterious woman, Iris, who agrees to be his "Christmas wife" - but only if he will ask her no questions about herself.

This is a quality "G" movie (at least, the version shown on television). At the risk of sounding sexist, I would say this is a woman's movie, but some men may find it not objectionable. Children may not be interested in a character (as opposed to action) movie about middle-aged people, but if they are, their parents won't have to worry about what they're watching. Adults who have some experience with age or loneliness may discover a tale striking quite a responsive chord.

"Over 50", Life 101
If you're over 50 this movie will be a great rainy afternoon delight. It is NOT a comedy! It is a hard look at life and what it brings. Jason Robards and Julie Harris are two of the classic actors of the last century. Just to see them act together is enough, but the sweet story of how life throws rocks in our path and the way we remove them is great! Treat yourself to perfection! ... Read more

Description

Drug Dealing. Gang Beatings.Prostitution. Animal Slaughter.They're all part of a typical day for the students of Lincoln High.Into this academic abyss arrives Andy Norris (Slaughterhouse Five's Perry King), an idealistic and na=EFve music teacher who has moved into the community with his pregnant wife Diane.Appalled by the crime-infested school, Norris soon crosses sabers with its teenage kingpin, the shrewd and sadistic Peter Stegman (The White Shadow's Timothy Van Patten).With Norris setting his sights on reforming Stegman, and the young miscreant declaring war on his teacher, the duo sets a fateful showdown into motion on the night of an important school orchestra performance.Directed and co-written by Mark L. Lester (Commando, Firestarter), CLASS OF 1984 is one of the seminal cult movies of the early 1980s.While its vision of a decaying, violence-plagued inner city school seemed over-the-top in 1982, it sadly prophesized the future of American education.Lester's film-which caused a stir at Cannes and reputedly offended one of its own screenwriters-is also notable for its cast, which includes Van Patten, Roddy McDowall and a very young Michael J Fox.Alice Cooper performs the theme song, "I Am The Future".No longer are the students of Lincoln High the future, for the future has arrived! ... Read more

Reviews (2)

You said it, brother.
I couldn't agree more with Gary Young when he calls "Class of 1984" one of the greatest exploitation flicks.I've seen it many times since it's release in 1982 and I couldn't be happier to see it finally make it's debut on DVD.Hopefully, the releasing company will give it the stellar presentation this great drive-in camp fest deserves.

Made at the height of the early-'80's paranoia about school violence--which was nearly 15 years before Columbine--"Class of 1984" follows idealistic music teacher Andy Norris (Perry King) as he begins his new job at a hellacious inner-city high school that is run by a psychotic gang of punk thugs led by music prodigy Richard Stegman (Timothy Van Patten, in a terrific performance).Stegman immediately takes a disliking to Norris, who refuses to back down from his threats, and things get uglier and uglier, leading to an all-out war and a glorious, super-gory final thirty minutes that has to be seen to be believed.

All this violence is admirably directed by veteran schlock-meister Mark L. Lester ("Bobbie Jo and the Outlaw"), who builds a tremendous amount of suspense and gets excellent performances out of his entire cast, which includes a very young Michael J. Fox as an ill-fated student and Roddy MacDowell, in one of his last good film roles as a teacher who is starting to crack under the pressure.Al Waxman is a rare voice of reason as a sympathetic cop whose hands are tied, and Lester's wife Merrie Lynn Ross is effective as Norris' wife, who has "potential rape victim" written all over her.And I love the theme song "I am the Future", by rocker Alice Cooper.

A word of warning:Take the five-star rating with a grain of salt.This isn't "Million Dollar Baby" or "The Godfather".Instead, "Class of 1984" is pure camp, with muddy photography and goofs/bloopers galore.It isn't meant to be high art.What it is is an example of irresponsible, ultra-violent filmmaking at its "guilty pleasure" best.Some viewers will be appalled, and some will dismiss it as pure trash.They're probably right.But for those who are game and are in the mood for a no-holds-barred revenge melodrama, hold on to your seats.

Take it from me, one viewing and you'll never look at a buzzsaw or a blowtorch the same way again.

***** (out of *****)

One of the Greatest Exploitation Flicks Makes its DVD Debut
Well, it's about time!Mark Lester's cult classic "Class of 1984" is finally coming out on DVD.This is definitely one of the finest B-movies of the 80's(if not of all time).
The plot concerns an idealistic young teacher(Perry King) who comes to teach at possibly the roughest inner city high school ever.Initially, he tries his hardest to inspire his problem students.And, by gosh, he gets through to several of them(including a young Michael J. Fox).Unfortunately, he doesn't succeed with Timothy Van Patton and his lowlife cronies.They make life hell for the poor teacher.
Instead of trying to be an inspirational story of a teacher who struggles against the odds to produce a class of model students, "Class of 1984" develops into a revenge saga.The teacher becomes just as savage as his worst students.
This is a must have for all cult film junkies.I can't wait to get my fix. ... Read more